close
標題:
Mi-24是不是一架成功的直昇機?
發問:
最佳解答:
因為可以攻擊直昇機加運輸但是Mi-24是不是萬能的呢? You watched that movie "9th Company" right? The real thing is not like that at all, for one, only 9 of the company's soldier were killed and not the whole company..... Anyway. No doubt that Mi-24 is a very nice design but they do have some bad thing to come with... When you look at an attack helicopter, you look at its to be agile and very controllable. That's why you use it for fire support mission when the all hell break loose (Want to use the s word but,....) Look at Mi24, firepower wise, it is more than enough to fulfill the attack configuration. But since it is bigger and heavier, they tent to become target to AA fire. It will be more like an overgrown HH-60, you can still bring it down with 1 or 2 RPG. And this kind of thing is not acceptable in Attack helicopter usage. Also, you need to consider the role it become, you call attack helicopter to hot and hairy situation, but you don't want to bring in troop in those area, if you have troop on board, then you need to consider their safty as well, and then you start to put all sort of armor and countermeasurment, which compromise speed and agility. In the end, too far from either shore. 和相比黑鷹(57mm火箭),兩者那隻速度快? Blackhawk is faster than Mi-24, just a bit tho 如果把黑鷹武裝,有沒有可能成為美國mi-24?(加hellfire,加機炮,加空對空) The question is not on would it be, but on does it need to be one. As i explained before, there are no need for Gunship like that, such design is for a situation that the ground force have already have surface control of the situation, on the otherhand, i reckon Mi24 could be a good Medievac helicopter but for its role of attack helicopter, i would still go for apache first, or even eurocopter tiger first, then Mi24
其他解答:
1. Nothing is perfect. Each vehicle will have its own disadvantages. It is a matter of time that they are discovered. 2. Mi-24 is faster in term of maximum speed. 3. The United States does not need a gunship like this because usually AH-64 Apache will take care this issue before the troops are dropped in the war zone. For detail, please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UH-60_Black_Hawk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mi-24
Mi-24是不是一架成功的直昇機?
發問:
此文章來自奇摩知識+如有不便請留言告知
因為可以攻擊直昇機加運輸 但是Mi-24是不是萬能的呢?因為很像說有不少問題 和相比黑鷹(57mm火箭),兩者那隻速度快? 如果把黑鷹武裝,有沒有可能成為美國mi-24?(加hellfire,加機炮,加空對空)最佳解答:
因為可以攻擊直昇機加運輸但是Mi-24是不是萬能的呢? You watched that movie "9th Company" right? The real thing is not like that at all, for one, only 9 of the company's soldier were killed and not the whole company..... Anyway. No doubt that Mi-24 is a very nice design but they do have some bad thing to come with... When you look at an attack helicopter, you look at its to be agile and very controllable. That's why you use it for fire support mission when the all hell break loose (Want to use the s word but,....) Look at Mi24, firepower wise, it is more than enough to fulfill the attack configuration. But since it is bigger and heavier, they tent to become target to AA fire. It will be more like an overgrown HH-60, you can still bring it down with 1 or 2 RPG. And this kind of thing is not acceptable in Attack helicopter usage. Also, you need to consider the role it become, you call attack helicopter to hot and hairy situation, but you don't want to bring in troop in those area, if you have troop on board, then you need to consider their safty as well, and then you start to put all sort of armor and countermeasurment, which compromise speed and agility. In the end, too far from either shore. 和相比黑鷹(57mm火箭),兩者那隻速度快? Blackhawk is faster than Mi-24, just a bit tho 如果把黑鷹武裝,有沒有可能成為美國mi-24?(加hellfire,加機炮,加空對空) The question is not on would it be, but on does it need to be one. As i explained before, there are no need for Gunship like that, such design is for a situation that the ground force have already have surface control of the situation, on the otherhand, i reckon Mi24 could be a good Medievac helicopter but for its role of attack helicopter, i would still go for apache first, or even eurocopter tiger first, then Mi24
其他解答:
1. Nothing is perfect. Each vehicle will have its own disadvantages. It is a matter of time that they are discovered. 2. Mi-24 is faster in term of maximum speed. 3. The United States does not need a gunship like this because usually AH-64 Apache will take care this issue before the troops are dropped in the war zone. For detail, please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UH-60_Black_Hawk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mi-24
文章標籤
全站熱搜
留言列表
